Banks in Alabama — Efficiency Ratio, 2010Q2
Population: 136 Call Report filers, reporting date 2010-06-30.
Cite as: FACTANKER, https://factanker.com/banks/state-al/efficiency-ratio/2010Q2
← 2010Q1 · 2010Q3 → · latest quarter
| 10th percentile | 51.5% |
|---|
| 25th percentile | 61.8% |
|---|
| Median | 70.5% |
|---|
| 75th percentile | 79.9% |
|---|
| 90th percentile | 93.8% |
|---|
| Mean | 72.0% |
|---|
| Minimum | 18.9% |
|---|
| Maximum | 144.4% |
|---|
Methodology & sources
Year-to-date noninterest expense (RIAD4093) divided by the sum of year-to-date net interest income (RIAD4074) and noninterest income (RIAD4079). Both sides cover the same window, so no annualization is applied. Lower is better.
One row per reporting institution (RSSD) as of 2010-06-30; percentiles computed in the database via percentile_cont, never by a model. Source: FFIEC Call Reports (public domain). Data: FACTANKER registry, precomputed 2026-09-03.
Evidence samples
Largest institutions in this group
Not claimed- Population is Call Report filers (FDIC-insured commercial banks and savings institutions). Credit unions, holding companies and non-US banks are not part of it.
- One row per reporting institution (RSSD), not per banking group: a holding company with three bank subsidiaries counts three times.
- Income statement items are year-to-date, not quarterly. Ratios marked annualized are multiplied by 4 / quarter number; net income is not.
- The state of an institution is its current head-office state from the Call Report directory, applied to all of its quarters.
- Comparisons across 2011Q4 / 2012Q1 are not pure market movement: thrift institutions moved from the Thrift Financial Report into the Call Report in 2012Q1 (filers 6,789 -> 7,377).
- sample_fact_ids evidence the three largest institutions of the class, not every number in the distribution.
All quarters of this metric · All Banks in Alabama benchmarks · All bank benchmarks