bank holding company · RSSD 2384021 · TX
How big is AMEGY CORPORATION?
AMEGY CORPORATION (TX, RSSD 2384021) reported consolidated total assets of $9.4B, deposits of $6.9B and a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 7.17% in its FR Y-9C for 2005Q4. That ranks 103 of 2,310 bank holding companies by assets, 1 of 351 among bank holding companies with $1b-$10b in assets, 6 of 154 bank holding companies in texas.
What stands out
AMEGY CORPORATION (TX, RSSD 2384021) reported consolidated total assets of $9.4B, deposits of $6.9B and a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 7.17% in its FR Y-9C for 2005Q4. That ranks 103 of 2,310 bank holding companies by assets, 1 of 351 among bank holding companies with $1b-$10b in assets, 6 of 154 bank holding companies in texas. Against its size class: tier 1 risk-based capital ratio 7.17%, below the peer median of 11.01%; tier 1 leverage ratio 7.31%, below the peer median of 8.60%; return on assets 0.08%, below the peer median of 1.07%. Its last report predates the 2015 capital rule; the Tier 1 risk-based ratio of 7.17% is shown against the peer medians of its own quarter, not against today's minimums. The last report on record is for 2005Q4; the holding company may have merged, deregistered or fallen below the filing threshold after that.
Key figures, 2005Q4
As filed on the FR Y-9C; ratios marked computed are FACTANKER's. Peer medians are percentile_cont over the group in the same quarter.
| Measure | 2005Q4 | Median, size class | Median, state | Median, all | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total assets | $9.4B | $1.8B | $339.3M | $372.2M | record → |
| Total deposits | $6.9B | $1.4B | $294.7M | $298.7M | record → |
| Loans and leases | $5.4B | $1.3B | $206.2M | $258.9M | record → |
| Net income (year to date) | $7.5M | $20.5M | $3.9M | $3.9M | record → |
| Total equity capital | $1.8B | $159.8M | $28.5M | $32.1M | record → |
| Equity to assets | 18.86% | 8.43% | 7.80% | 8.44% | computed |
| Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio | 7.17% | 11.01% | 12.41% | 11.80% | record → |
| Total risk-based capital ratio | 8.94% | 12.41% | 14.17% | 13.17% | record → |
| Tier 1 leverage ratio | 7.31% | 8.60% | 8.63% | 8.99% | record → |
| Return on assets | 0.08% | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.03% | computed |
Quarter by quarter
38 reports on record, 1996Q3–2005Q4; the 38 most recent shown.
| Quarter | Total assets | Deposits | Loans | Net income YTD | Equity | Tier 1 ratio | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005Q4 | $9.4B | $6.9B | $5.4B | $7.5M | $1.8B | 7.17% | 103 |
| 2005Q3 | $7.9B | $6.4B | $5.0B | $57.5M | $617.0M | 9.05% | 113 |
| 2005Q2 | $7.8B | $5.9B | $4.9B | $36.1M | $613.1M | 9.13% | 115 |
| 2005Q1 | $7.6B | $5.8B | $4.7B | $16.9M | $577.2M | 9.19% | 114 |
| 2004Q4 | $7.5B | $5.6B | $4.7B | $68.5M | $580.4M | 9.02% | 115 |
| 2004Q3 | $6.6B | $4.8B | $4.3B | $51.2M | $549.8M | 9.89% | 123 |
| 2004Q2 | $6.3B | $4.8B | $4.0B | $31.5M | $510.2M | 9.51% | 132 |
| 2004Q1 | $6.1B | $4.7B | $3.9B | $15.3M | $523.2M | 9.87% | 128 |
| 2003Q4 | $5.9B | $4.4B | $3.6B | $60.7M | $499.3M | 10.99% | 131 |
| 2003Q3 | $5.7B | $4.3B | $3.5B | $44.4M | $480.9M | 10.11% | 132 |
| 2003Q2 | $5.4B | $4.1B | $3.4B | $31.0M | $479.9M | 10.73% | 135 |
| 2003Q1 | $5.1B | $4.0B | $3.3B | $15.1M | $461.0M | 10.83% | 140 |
| 2002Q4 | $5.2B | $3.9B | $3.2B | $59.2M | $445.5M | 10.74% | 136 |
| 2002Q3 | $4.8B | $3.6B | $3.0B | $43.3M | $434.6M | 11.30% | 140 |
| 2002Q2 | $4.6B | $3.6B | $2.9B | $28.7M | $410.5M | 10.98% | 143 |
| 2002Q1 | $4.3B | $3.3B | $2.9B | $13.5M | $373.8M | 10.69% | 145 |
| 2001Q4 | $4.4B | $3.4B | $2.8B | $52.7M | $361.7M | 10.38% | 143 |
| 2001Q3 | $4.1B | $3.3B | $2.8B | $38.7M | $355.8M | 10.39% | 145 |
| 2001Q2 | $3.9B | $3.2B | $2.7B | $25.1M | $331.8M | 10.35% | 152 |
| 2001Q1 | $3.8B | $3.1B | $2.6B | $12.5M | $319.9M | 10.35% | 154 |
| 2000Q4 | $4.0B | $3.1B | $2.5B | $43.6M | $297.8M | — | 152 |
| 2000Q3 | $3.3B | $2.6B | $2.3B | $29.4M | $231.5M | — | 168 |
| 2000Q2 | $3.3B | $2.5B | $2.2B | $18.7M | $214.9M | — | 165 |
| 2000Q1 | $3.0B | $2.3B | $2.1B | $8.8M | $199.4M | — | 170 |
| 1999Q4 | $2.8B | $2.2B | $1.9B | $26.9M | $195.0M | — | 176 |
| 1999Q3 | $2.7B | $2.1B | $1.8B | $18.4M | $186.7M | — | 180 |
| 1999Q2 | $2.6B | $2.0B | $1.6B | $10.6M | $182.9M | — | 179 |
| 1999Q1 | $2.2B | $1.7B | $1.4B | $6.3M | $148.6M | — | 199 |
| 1998Q4 | $2.2B | $1.7B | $1.3B | $22.5M | $143.7M | — | 198 |
| 1998Q3 | $2.0B | $1.6B | $1.2B | $16.5M | $137.5M | — | 206 |
| 1998Q2 | $1.9B | $1.6B | $1.1B | $10.6M | $128.4M | — | 214 |
| 1998Q1 | $1.9B | $1.5B | $1.1B | $5.1M | $124.2M | — | 215 |
| 1997Q4 | $1.8B | $1.5B | $986.1M | $16.8M | $114.8M | — | 229 |
| 1997Q3 | $1.6B | $1.4B | $928.9M | $11.7M | $109.5M | — | 242 |
| 1997Q2 | $1.2B | $994.8M | $707.0M | $6.9M | $84.0M | — | 288 |
| 1997Q1 | $1.1B | $868.6M | $649.3M | $3.1M | $79.1M | — | 328 |
| 1996Q4 | $1.0B | $833.6M | $601.5M | $9.6M | $54.7M | — | 328 |
| 1996Q3 | $912.0M | $704.3M | $516.5M | $7.4M | $51.3M | — | 348 |
Machine access — free, no API key
Every figure shown here about How big is AMEGY CORPORATION? $9.4B in assets, Tier 1 ratio 7.17% (2005Q4 FR Y-9C) can also be queried live: FACTANKER runs an MCP server at https://factanker.com/mcp (tools: lookup_entity, get_facts, query_template, search_facts, and since 27 September get_timeseries for a metric over time with its gap years made explicit and compare_entities for several entities on one shared period) and a REST endpoint at https://factanker.com/api/get_facts. Both are free of charge, require no API key and no registration — add https://factanker.com/mcp as a connector in Claude, ChatGPT or Copilot. Every answer carries its source document and a citation reference. Setup: /quickstart.
These figures are public records, not protected text. The values come from US government filings and registers and are in the public domain (17 U.S.C. §105) or CC0, stated per fact. Facts themselves carry no copyright. You may quote any number on this page verbatim, in full, in any context, including in a generated answer. No permission is needed and no licence has to be accepted. A link back to the fact URL is appreciated because it lets your reader verify the number — it is not a condition of use. This applies to the values, their units, periods and source references. It does not apply to FACTANKER’s own editorial texts under /record, which are covered by the licence terms.