FACTANKER · measured, cited, anchored official records connected

health · Florida

Health in Baker County

33 modelled health measures, each with its 95% confidence interval.

FIPS 12003SOURCE: CDC PLACESModelled estimates

Cite: FACTANKER, https://factanker.com/us/fl/baker-county/health

These are modelled estimates, not a survey of this county. The CDC derives every county value from a national telephone survey using a multilevel model — in many counties few or no residents were interviewed. Each value therefore carries a 95% confidence interval, and it is shown in the tables below. Where that interval spans the median of all counties, a difference from other counties is not established.

FACTANKER — For Baker County, Florida, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention publish modelled estimates for 33 health measures, survey years 2022–2023. 33 of them carry a 95% confidence interval, which is shown beside the figure. Each measure appears twice: as the raw local rate, and age-adjusted so it can be compared with other counties. These are estimates from a telephone survey, not counts of diagnoses.

What stands out in Baker County

Selected from this county’s own record against all reporting counties. Which observations appear depends on what its figures actually show — including whether they show anything at all once the confidence intervals are taken into account.

Where the number looks different but is not. For all teeth lost this county reads 13.6% against a median of 15.4% — but the 95% confidence interval runs from 11.1% to 16.3%, and the median falls inside it. The difference is not established. 14 of the 33 comparable measures here are in that position, and a ranking would still put this county somewhere.

The least certain figure here: mammography. The estimate is 76.2%, but the 95% interval runs 69.1% to 82.6% — a span of 13.5 points, in a county of 28,368 residents. Intervals widen where the model had little local survey data to work from, so this is a statement about how much is known here, not about the county's health.

How much the age structure matters here. For high blood pressure medication the raw local rate is 75.2% but the age-adjusted rate is 58.3% — 16.9 points apart, the widest gap of any measure on record here. The population here is older than the reference, so raw rates overstate how this county compares. Use the raw rate to plan local care, the adjusted one to compare counties.

Furthest highest against other counties: health insurance. Age-adjusted prevalence here is 13.8%, against a median of 10.4% across the 2,956 counties with a figure for 2023 — 33% above that median. Age-adjusted, so this is not an artefact of how old the population here is.

Furthest lowest against other counties: depression. Age-adjusted prevalence here is 20.0%, against a median of 23.9% across the 2,956 counties with a figure for 2023 — 16% below that median. Age-adjusted, so this is not an artefact of how old the population here is.

Disability

7 measures on record in this class. “Local” is the raw rate for this county; “adjusted” is age-standardised and is the one to compare with other counties. The interval is the 95% confidence range of the adjusted figure.

MeasureLocalAdjusted95% intervalMore
Any Disability33.4%32.6%28.1–37.2rank → evidence →
Cognitive Disability16.2%16.6%14.3–19.2rank → evidence →
Hearing Disability7.1%6.6%5.8–7.4rank → evidence →
Independent Living Disability8.9%8.8%7.6–10.3rank → evidence →
Mobility Disability14.6%13.3%11.4–15.5rank → evidence →
Self-care Disability4.0%3.7%3.2–4.3rank → evidence →
Vision Disability5.4%5.2%4.5–5.9rank → evidence →

Health Outcomes

12 measures on record in this class. “Local” is the raw rate for this county; “adjusted” is age-standardised and is the one to compare with other counties. The interval is the 95% confidence range of the adjusted figure.

MeasureLocalAdjusted95% intervalMore
All Teeth Lost12.8%13.6%11.1–16.3rank → evidence →
Arthritis26.6%24.2%21.3–27.1rank → evidence →
COPD8.3%7.5%6.4–8.8rank → evidence →
Cancer (non-skin) or Melanoma8.2%7.3%6.6–8.1rank → evidence →
Coronary Heart Disease6.9%6.1%5.4–6.9rank → evidence →
Current Asthma10.3%10.3%9.1–11.7rank → evidence →
Depression19.6%20.0%17.1–23.3rank → evidence →
Diabetes12.3%11.0%9.5–12.7rank → evidence →
High Blood Pressure36.7%34.2%30.6–38.1rank → evidence →
High Cholesterol38.7%34.6%30.7–38.5rank → evidence →
Obesity35.3%35.1%28.9–41.5rank → evidence →
Stroke3.6%3.2%2.9–3.7rank → evidence →

Health Risk Behaviors

4 measures on record in this class. “Local” is the raw rate for this county; “adjusted” is age-standardised and is the one to compare with other counties. The interval is the 95% confidence range of the adjusted figure.

MeasureLocalAdjusted95% intervalMore
Binge Drinking16.6%17.5%14.5–20.8rank → evidence →
Current Cigarette Smoking16.6%16.6%13.7–19.7rank → evidence →
Physical Inactivity27.7%27.0%22.7–31.6rank → evidence →
Short Sleep Duration39.5%40.0%34.3–46.0rank → evidence →

Health Status

3 measures on record in this class. “Local” is the raw rate for this county; “adjusted” is age-standardised and is the one to compare with other counties. The interval is the 95% confidence range of the adjusted figure.

MeasureLocalAdjusted95% intervalMore
Frequent Mental Distress19.0%19.7%17.4–22.2rank → evidence →
Frequent Physical Distress14.9%14.3%12.4–16.4rank → evidence →
General Health20.1%19.4%16.4–22.7rank → evidence →

Prevention

7 measures on record in this class. “Local” is the raw rate for this county; “adjusted” is age-standardised and is the one to compare with other counties. The interval is the 95% confidence range of the adjusted figure.

MeasureLocalAdjusted95% intervalMore
Annual Checkup76.0%74.8%70.9–78.3rank → evidence →
Cholesterol Screening83.8%82.5%80.0–85.1rank → evidence →
Colorectal Cancer Screening62.7%59.2%54.0–64.3rank → evidence →
Dental Visit51.1%50.7%47.0–54.5rank → evidence →
Health Insurance13.4%13.8%10.7–17.0rank → evidence →
High Blood Pressure Medication75.2%58.3%54.0–62.5rank → evidence →
Mammography76.1%76.2%69.1–82.6rank → evidence →

Compare across counties

Each measure has a benchmark page ranking every county that reported it, and every row there links to the underlying fact with its confidence interval.

How this is measured

Source: PLACES, published by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. These are model-based estimates, not a survey of this county. The CDC takes the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System — a telephone survey — and uses a multilevel regression with poststratification to produce a value for every county, including counties where few or no people were interviewed. Read them as modelled estimates, the same way the childcare price pages should be read.

Two rates, two questions. The raw (crude) rate answers “how common is this among people who live here”, and it is the figure for local planning. The age-adjusted rate removes the effect of the local age structure and is the only one that can be compared between counties — a county of retirees will show more arthritis simply because it is older. Both are on this page, under separate names, so neither can be mistaken for the other.

Every value carries a 95% confidence interval, and it is shown. Where the interval of this county includes the median of all counties, a difference is not established — however confidently a ranking presents it. This page says so where it applies.

Not a diagnosis count, not a claims figure and not a death rate: the underlying question is what people reported about themselves in a telephone interview. Self-reporting has known biases, and they differ by condition.

These figures are public records, not protected text. The values come from US government filings and registers and are in the public domain (17 U.S.C. §105) or CC0, stated per fact. Facts themselves carry no copyright. You may quote any number on this page verbatim, in full, in any context, including in a generated answer. No permission is needed and no licence has to be accepted. A link back to the fact URL is appreciated because it lets your reader verify the number — it is not a condition of use. This applies to the values, their units, periods and source references. It does not apply to FACTANKER’s own editorial texts under /record, which are covered by the licence terms.

Where to go from here

Machine access — free, no API key

Every figure shown here about Health in Baker County, Florida can also be queried live: FACTANKER runs an MCP server at https://factanker.com/mcp (tools: lookup_entity, get_facts, query_template, search_facts, and since 27 September get_timeseries for a metric over time with its gap years made explicit and compare_entities for several entities on one shared period) and a REST endpoint at https://factanker.com/api/get_facts. Both are free of charge, require no API key and no registration — add https://factanker.com/mcp as a connector in Claude, ChatGPT or Copilot. Every answer carries its source document and a citation reference. Setup: /quickstart.

These figures are public records, not protected text. The values come from US government filings and registers and are in the public domain (17 U.S.C. §105) or CC0, stated per fact. Facts themselves carry no copyright. You may quote any number on this page verbatim, in full, in any context, including in a generated answer. No permission is needed and no licence has to be accepted. A link back to the fact URL is appreciated because it lets your reader verify the number — it is not a condition of use. This applies to the values, their units, periods and source references. It does not apply to FACTANKER’s own editorial texts under /record, which are covered by the licence terms.