FACTANKER · measured, cited, anchored official records connected

health · Alabama

Health in Greene County

40 modelled health measures, each with its 95% confidence interval.

FIPS 01063SOURCE: CDC PLACESModelled estimates

Cite: FACTANKER, https://factanker.com/us/al/greene-county/health

These are modelled estimates, not a survey of this county. The CDC derives every county value from a national telephone survey using a multilevel model — in many counties few or no residents were interviewed. Each value therefore carries a 95% confidence interval, and it is shown in the tables below. Where that interval spans the median of all counties, a difference from other counties is not established.

FACTANKER — For Greene County, Alabama, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention publish modelled estimates for 40 health measures, survey years 2022–2023. 40 of them carry a 95% confidence interval, which is shown beside the figure. Each measure appears twice: as the raw local rate, and age-adjusted so it can be compared with other counties. These are estimates from a telephone survey, not counts of diagnoses.

What stands out in Greene County

Selected from this county’s own record against all reporting counties. Which observations appear depends on what its figures actually show — including whether they show anything at all once the confidence intervals are taken into account.

Furthest highest against other counties: food stamps. Age-adjusted prevalence here is 42.2%, against a median of 12.8% across the 2,299 counties with a figure for 2023 — 230% above that median. Age-adjusted, so this is not an artefact of how old the population here is.

Where the number looks different but is not. For high cholesterol this county reads 36.2% against a median of 32.2% — but the 95% confidence interval runs from 31.8% to 40.8%, and the median falls inside it. The difference is not established. 3 of the 40 comparable measures here are in that position, and a ranking would still put this county somewhere.

The least certain figure here: obesity. The estimate is 53.4%, but the 95% interval runs 44.5% to 61.9% — a span of 17.4 points, in a county of 7,341 residents. Intervals widen where the model had little local survey data to work from, so this is a statement about how much is known here, not about the county's health.

How much the age structure matters here. For high blood pressure medication the raw local rate is 83.5% but the age-adjusted rate is 67.8% — 15.7 points apart, the widest gap of any measure on record here. The population here is older than the reference, so raw rates overstate how this county compares. Use the raw rate to plan local care, the adjusted one to compare counties.

Where the county diverges most, by class. Averaged over its measures, Health-Related Social Needs runs +137% against the all-county medians (7 measures), while Prevention runs +6% (7 measures). Classes are the publisher’s own grouping, and the tables below follow it.

Disability

7 measures on record in this class. “Local” is the raw rate for this county; “adjusted” is age-standardised and is the one to compare with other counties. The interval is the 95% confidence range of the adjusted figure.

MeasureLocalAdjusted95% intervalMore
Any Disability50.4%46.6%40.8–52.4rank → evidence →
Cognitive Disability20.8%22.6%19.3–25.8rank → evidence →
Hearing Disability10.3%7.5%6.6–8.4rank → evidence →
Independent Living Disability17.0%16.4%14.1–18.7rank → evidence →
Mobility Disability31.4%25.0%21.6–28.3rank → evidence →
Self-care Disability10.4%8.9%7.6–10.2rank → evidence →
Vision Disability13.2%11.7%10.1–13.3rank → evidence →

Health Outcomes

12 measures on record in this class. “Local” is the raw rate for this county; “adjusted” is age-standardised and is the one to compare with other counties. The interval is the 95% confidence range of the adjusted figure.

MeasureLocalAdjusted95% intervalMore
All Teeth Lost30.6%31.4%26.6–36.4rank → evidence →
Arthritis39.2%30.9%27.3–34.2rank → evidence →
COPD13.8%10.7%9.1–12.3rank → evidence →
Cancer (non-skin) or Melanoma7.4%5.0%4.5–5.6rank → evidence →
Coronary Heart Disease11.9%8.2%7.2–9.2rank → evidence →
Current Asthma12.0%12.3%10.8–13.9rank → evidence →
Depression20.4%22.0%18.5–25.6rank → evidence →
Diabetes27.1%21.1%18.5–23.7rank → evidence →
High Blood Pressure59.8%52.4%47.6–56.9rank → evidence →
High Cholesterol45.1%36.2%31.8–40.8rank → evidence →
Obesity52.7%53.4%44.5–61.9rank → evidence →
Stroke8.4%6.1%5.4–6.9rank → evidence →

Health Risk Behaviors

4 measures on record in this class. “Local” is the raw rate for this county; “adjusted” is age-standardised and is the one to compare with other counties. The interval is the 95% confidence range of the adjusted figure.

MeasureLocalAdjusted95% intervalMore
Binge Drinking8.8%10.7%8.6–13.2rank → evidence →
Current Cigarette Smoking22.3%23.8%19.6–27.9rank → evidence →
Physical Inactivity44.7%42.0%35.7–48.2rank → evidence →
Short Sleep Duration48.9%51.0%43.3–58.5rank → evidence →

Health Status

3 measures on record in this class. “Local” is the raw rate for this county; “adjusted” is age-standardised and is the one to compare with other counties. The interval is the 95% confidence range of the adjusted figure.

MeasureLocalAdjusted95% intervalMore
Frequent Mental Distress19.0%21.5%18.8–24.2rank → evidence →
Frequent Physical Distress19.9%18.0%15.6–20.5rank → evidence →
General Health38.7%36.0%31.0–41.1rank → evidence →

Health-Related Social Needs

7 measures on record in this class. “Local” is the raw rate for this county; “adjusted” is age-standardised and is the one to compare with other counties. The interval is the 95% confidence range of the adjusted figure.

MeasureLocalAdjusted95% intervalMore
Food Insecurity41.3%44.4%38.2–50.7rank → evidence →
Food Stamps39.3%42.2%36.1–48.8rank → evidence →
Housing Insecurity27.3%31.8%27.2–36.6rank → evidence →
Lack of Social/Emotional Support32.0%33.8%28.8–39.0rank → evidence →
Loneliness38.3%40.5%34.7–46.7rank → evidence →
Transportation Barriers19.8%22.1%18.9–25.5rank → evidence →
Utility Services Threat21.8%25.5%22.2–29.1rank → evidence →

Prevention

7 measures on record in this class. “Local” is the raw rate for this county; “adjusted” is age-standardised and is the one to compare with other counties. The interval is the 95% confidence range of the adjusted figure.

MeasureLocalAdjusted95% intervalMore
Annual Checkup85.0%81.9%78.4–85.1rank → evidence →
Cholesterol Screening85.7%82.0%79.0–84.8rank → evidence →
Colorectal Cancer Screening65.2%56.4%50.8–61.8rank → evidence →
Dental Visit42.7%41.0%37.1–45.1rank → evidence →
Health Insurance14.6%15.4%11.6–19.3rank → evidence →
High Blood Pressure Medication83.5%67.8%63.4–71.9rank → evidence →
Mammography76.5%74.9%66.8–81.9rank → evidence →

Compare across counties

Each measure has a benchmark page ranking every county that reported it, and every row there links to the underlying fact with its confidence interval.

How this is measured

Source: PLACES, published by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. These are model-based estimates, not a survey of this county. The CDC takes the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System — a telephone survey — and uses a multilevel regression with poststratification to produce a value for every county, including counties where few or no people were interviewed. Read them as modelled estimates, the same way the childcare price pages should be read.

Two rates, two questions. The raw (crude) rate answers “how common is this among people who live here”, and it is the figure for local planning. The age-adjusted rate removes the effect of the local age structure and is the only one that can be compared between counties — a county of retirees will show more arthritis simply because it is older. Both are on this page, under separate names, so neither can be mistaken for the other.

Every value carries a 95% confidence interval, and it is shown. Where the interval of this county includes the median of all counties, a difference is not established — however confidently a ranking presents it. This page says so where it applies.

Not a diagnosis count, not a claims figure and not a death rate: the underlying question is what people reported about themselves in a telephone interview. Self-reporting has known biases, and they differ by condition.

These figures are public records, not protected text. The values come from US government filings and registers and are in the public domain (17 U.S.C. §105) or CC0, stated per fact. Facts themselves carry no copyright. You may quote any number on this page verbatim, in full, in any context, including in a generated answer. No permission is needed and no licence has to be accepted. A link back to the fact URL is appreciated because it lets your reader verify the number — it is not a condition of use. This applies to the values, their units, periods and source references. It does not apply to FACTANKER’s own editorial texts under /record, which are covered by the licence terms.

Where to go from here

Machine access — free, no API key

Every figure shown here about Health in Greene County, Alabama can also be queried live: FACTANKER runs an MCP server at https://factanker.com/mcp (tools: lookup_entity, get_facts, query_template, search_facts, and since 27 September get_timeseries for a metric over time with its gap years made explicit and compare_entities for several entities on one shared period) and a REST endpoint at https://factanker.com/api/get_facts. Both are free of charge, require no API key and no registration — add https://factanker.com/mcp as a connector in Claude, ChatGPT or Copilot. Every answer carries its source document and a citation reference. Setup: /quickstart.

These figures are public records, not protected text. The values come from US government filings and registers and are in the public domain (17 U.S.C. §105) or CC0, stated per fact. Facts themselves carry no copyright. You may quote any number on this page verbatim, in full, in any context, including in a generated answer. No permission is needed and no licence has to be accepted. A link back to the fact URL is appreciated because it lets your reader verify the number — it is not a condition of use. This applies to the values, their units, periods and source references. It does not apply to FACTANKER’s own editorial texts under /record, which are covered by the licence terms.