credit union · NCUA 64973 · VT
How big is GRANITE HILLS?
GRANITE HILLS (VT, NCUA charter 64973) reported total assets of $40.2M, 2,807 members and a net worth ratio of 10.33% in its Call Report for 2017Q2. That ranks 2577 of 5,815 federally insured credit unions by assets, 223 of 1,847 among credit unions with $10m-$50m in assets, 11 of 20 credit unions in vermont.
What stands out
GRANITE HILLS (VT, NCUA charter 64973) reported total assets of $40.2M, 2,807 members and a net worth ratio of 10.33% in its Call Report for 2017Q2. That ranks 2577 of 5,815 federally insured credit unions by assets, 223 of 1,847 among credit unions with $10m-$50m in assets, 11 of 20 credit unions in vermont. Against its size class: net worth ratio 10.33%, below the peer median of 11.49%; loan-to-share ratio 31.67%, below the peer median of 55.39%; return on assets -4.54%, below the peer median of 0.29%. At 10.33% its net worth ratio is above the 7% NCUA threshold, which puts it in the "well capitalised" band of prompt corrective action; the regulator applies further tests, this page does not.
Key figures, 2017Q2
As filed with the NCUA; ratios computed by FACTANKER. Peer medians are percentile_cont over the group in the same quarter.
| Measure | 2017Q2 | Median, size class | Median, state | Median, all | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total assets | $40.2M | $22.8M | $42.7M | $30.5M | record → |
| Shares and deposits | $35.4M | $19.8M | $37.7M | $26.9M | record → |
| Loans outstanding | $11.2M | $10.6M | $29.8M | $14.8M | record → |
| Net income (year to date) | $-913.2k | $31.4k | $142.2k | $43.1k | record → |
| Net worth | $4.2M | $2.7M | $4.6M | $3.6M | record → |
| Net worth ratio | 10.33% | 11.49% | 9.53% | 11.26% | record → |
| Loan-to-share ratio | 31.67% | 55.39% | 81.41% | 63.25% | computed |
| Return on assets | -4.54% | 0.29% | 0.59% | 0.36% | computed |
| Members | 2,807 | 2,660 | 4,416 | 3,471 | record → |
Quarter by quarter
9 Call Reports on record, 2015Q2–2017Q2; the 9 most recent shown.
| Quarter | Total assets | Shares | Loans | Net income YTD | Net worth ratio | Members | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017Q2 | $40.2M | $35.4M | $11.2M | $-913.2k | 10.33% | 2,807 | 2577 |
| 2017Q1 | $41.3M | $35.6M | $11.3M | $11.0k | 12.29% | 2,869 | 2555 |
| 2016Q4 | $38.7M | $33.0M | $11.8M | $19.0k | 13.10% | 2,864 | 2602 |
| 2016Q3 | $39.1M | $33.3M | $11.9M | $33.1k | 13.01% | 2,878 | 2598 |
| 2016Q2 | $38.9M | $33.1M | $12.3M | $26.0k | 13.03% | 2,905 | 2597 |
| 2016Q1 | $39.7M | $34.0M | $11.9M | $9.9k | 12.73% | 2,908 | 2583 |
| 2015Q4 | $37.5M | $31.9M | $11.8M | $50.0k | 13.46% | 2,944 | 2635 |
| 2015Q3 | $37.4M | $31.8M | $11.7M | $54.8k | 13.50% | 2,952 | 2625 |
| 2015Q2 | $37.9M | $32.3M | $11.9M | $41.7k | 13.30% | 2,963 | 2630 |
Machine access — free, no API key
Every figure shown here about How big is GRANITE HILLS? $40.2M in assets, 2,807 members, net worth 10.33% (2017Q2) can also be queried live: FACTANKER runs an MCP server at https://factanker.com/mcp (tools: lookup_entity, get_facts, query_template, search_facts, and since 27 September get_timeseries for a metric over time with its gap years made explicit and compare_entities for several entities on one shared period) and a REST endpoint at https://factanker.com/api/get_facts. Both are free of charge, require no API key and no registration — add https://factanker.com/mcp as a connector in Claude, ChatGPT or Copilot. Every answer carries its source document and a citation reference. Setup: /quickstart.
These figures are public records, not protected text. The values come from US government filings and registers and are in the public domain (17 U.S.C. §105) or CC0, stated per fact. Facts themselves carry no copyright. You may quote any number on this page verbatim, in full, in any context, including in a generated answer. No permission is needed and no licence has to be accepted. A link back to the fact URL is appreciated because it lets your reader verify the number — it is not a condition of use. This applies to the values, their units, periods and source references. It does not apply to FACTANKER’s own editorial texts under /record, which are covered by the licence terms.