bank holding company · RSSD 1427305 · CT
How big is DIME FINANCIAL CORPORATION?
DIME FINANCIAL CORPORATION (CT, RSSD 1427305) reported consolidated total assets of $1.0B, deposits of $851.7M in its FR Y-9C for 1998Q2. That ranks 322 of 1,563 bank holding companies by assets, 245 of 251 among bank holding companies with $1b-$10b in assets, 3 of 14 bank holding companies in connecticut.
What stands out
DIME FINANCIAL CORPORATION (CT, RSSD 1427305) reported consolidated total assets of $1.0B, deposits of $851.7M in its FR Y-9C for 1998Q2. That ranks 322 of 1,563 bank holding companies by assets, 245 of 251 among bank holding companies with $1b-$10b in assets, 3 of 14 bank holding companies in connecticut. Against its size class: return on assets 1.00%, below the peer median of 1.17%. The last report on record is for 1998Q2; the holding company may have merged, deregistered or fallen below the filing threshold after that.
Key figures, 1998Q2
As filed on the FR Y-9C; ratios marked computed are FACTANKER's. Peer medians are percentile_cont over the group in the same quarter.
| Measure | 1998Q2 | Median, size class | Median, state | Median, all | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total assets | $1.0B | $2.1B | $451.3M | $320.6M | record → |
| Total deposits | $851.7M | $1.5B | $328.2M | $268.0M | record → |
| Loans and leases | $370.0M | $1.3B | $268.4M | $201.8M | record → |
| Net income (year to date) | $5.1M | $12.0M | $3.1M | $1.9M | record → |
| Total equity capital | $85.1M | $173.6M | $47.5M | $30.8M | record → |
| Equity to assets | 8.34% | 8.78% | 8.77% | 9.04% | computed |
| Return on assets | 1.00% | 1.17% | 0.98% | 1.16% | computed |
Quarter by quarter
39 reports on record, 1988Q4–1998Q2; the 39 most recent shown.
| Quarter | Total assets | Deposits | Loans | Net income YTD | Equity | Tier 1 ratio | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1998Q2 | $1.0B | $851.7M | $370.0M | $5.1M | $85.1M | — | 322 |
| 1998Q1 | $1.0B | $851.6M | $374.8M | $2.6M | $82.4M | — | 321 |
| 1997Q4 | $961.0M | $815.5M | $373.5M | $16.7M | $79.3M | — | 340 |
| 1997Q3 | $922.0M | $792.0M | $380.0M | $12.3M | $75.0M | — | 353 |
| 1997Q2 | $874.3M | $755.5M | $389.5M | $7.9M | $69.6M | — | 367 |
| 1997Q1 | $814.7M | $686.8M | $392.8M | $3.8M | $63.8M | — | 392 |
| 1996Q4 | $751.6M | $625.5M | $400.2M | $12.5M | $62.6M | — | 414 |
| 1996Q3 | $692.1M | $569.2M | $412.8M | $9.1M | $59.4M | — | 423 |
| 1996Q2 | $689.2M | $569.2M | $423.0M | $5.9M | $56.5M | — | 427 |
| 1996Q1 | $671.5M | $554.4M | $443.2M | $2.9M | $53.4M | — | 437 |
| 1995Q4 | $658.4M | $542.3M | $456.5M | $6.0M | $51.7M | — | 441 |
| 1995Q3 | $632.6M | $519.9M | $480.2M | $3.4M | $48.7M | — | 445 |
| 1995Q2 | $639.4M | $528.3M | $492.1M | $1.2M | $46.5M | — | 439 |
| 1995Q1 | $631.8M | $523.8M | $505.9M | $-791.0k | $44.3M | — | 437 |
| 1994Q4 | $637.8M | $527.2M | $510.4M | $4.7M | $45.2M | — | 434 |
| 1994Q3 | $663.8M | $539.0M | $527.7M | $3.6M | $44.1M | — | 411 |
| 1994Q2 | $669.3M | $560.6M | $538.2M | $2.5M | $43.0M | — | 411 |
| 1994Q1 | $671.4M | $563.4M | $532.7M | $1.2M | $41.7M | — | 415 |
| 1993Q4 | $672.2M | $564.1M | $528.5M | $-23.4M | $40.4M | — | 413 |
| 1993Q3 | $700.1M | $570.1M | $550.4M | $1.3M | $65.1M | — | 399 |
| 1993Q2 | $735.4M | $579.2M | $567.2M | $703.0k | $64.5M | — | 391 |
| 1993Q1 | $734.7M | $578.2M | $582.1M | $146.0k | $63.9M | — | 386 |
| 1992Q4 | $748.3M | $592.4M | $592.1M | $1.8M | $63.8M | — | 390 |
| 1992Q3 | $765.6M | $596.1M | $618.6M | $1.4M | $63.4M | — | 393 |
| 1992Q2 | $786.6M | $601.1M | $640.2M | $1.6M | $63.5M | — | 393 |
| 1992Q1 | $804.5M | $618.3M | $647.7M | $406.0k | $62.4M | — | 389 |
| 1991Q4 | $794.0M | $603.7M | $673.3M | $-24.6M | $62.0M | — | 391 |
| 1991Q3 | $798.6M | $585.8M | $694.3M | $-18.8M | $67.9M | — | 382 |
| 1991Q2 | $807.3M | $583.9M | $708.1M | $-12.7M | $74.0M | — | 384 |
| 1991Q1 | $808.1M | $559.7M | $712.8M | $622.0k | $87.0M | — | 385 |
| 1990Q4 | $817.2M | $550.5M | $717.3M | $4.4M | $86.5M | — | 392 |
| 1990Q3 | $810.4M | $544.0M | $718.3M | $5.1M | $87.8M | — | 389 |
| 1990Q2 | $803.3M | $541.4M | $713.2M | $3.7M | $90.5M | — | 383 |
| 1990Q1 | $793.4M | $525.8M | $696.2M | $1.9M | $89.8M | — | 381 |
| 1989Q4 | $780.4M | $502.7M | $689.4M | $7.3M | $88.9M | — | 322 |
| 1989Q3 | $764.7M | $473.3M | $672.7M | $5.5M | $88.2M | — | 292 |
| 1989Q2 | $735.6M | $460.8M | $664.5M | $3.6M | $87.4M | — | 295 |
| 1989Q1 | $725.3M | $456.1M | $652.7M | $1.9M | $86.5M | — | 295 |
| 1988Q4 | $695.1M | $452.5M | $630.5M | $6.9M | $85.1M | — | 301 |
Machine access — free, no API key
Every figure shown here about How big is DIME FINANCIAL CORPORATION? $1.0B in assets (1998Q2 FR Y-9C) can also be queried live: FACTANKER runs an MCP server at https://factanker.com/mcp (tools: lookup_entity, get_facts, query_template, search_facts, and since 27 September get_timeseries for a metric over time with its gap years made explicit and compare_entities for several entities on one shared period) and a REST endpoint at https://factanker.com/api/get_facts. Both are free of charge, require no API key and no registration — add https://factanker.com/mcp as a connector in Claude, ChatGPT or Copilot. Every answer carries its source document and a citation reference. Setup: /quickstart.
These figures are public records, not protected text. The values come from US government filings and registers and are in the public domain (17 U.S.C. §105) or CC0, stated per fact. Facts themselves carry no copyright. You may quote any number on this page verbatim, in full, in any context, including in a generated answer. No permission is needed and no licence has to be accepted. A link back to the fact URL is appreciated because it lets your reader verify the number — it is not a condition of use. This applies to the values, their units, periods and source references. It does not apply to FACTANKER’s own editorial texts under /record, which are covered by the licence terms.