FACTANKER · measured, cited, anchored official records connected

Emissions · county

Greenhouse gas emissions in Scott County

Large facilities in Scott County, Missouri reported 1.47 million t of direct greenhouse gas emissions in 2023 (1 facilities), EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program.

Cite: FACTANKER, https://factanker.com/us/mo/scott-county/emissions

How much greenhouse gas do large facilities in Scott County, Missouri emit?

YearDirect emissionsReporting facilities
20101.89 million t1
20111.92 million t1
20121.62 million t1
20131.79 million t1
20141.76 million t1
20151.36 million t1
20161.57 million t1
20171.72 million t1
20181.71 million t1
20191.56 million t1
20201.62 million t1
20211.82 million t1
20221.63 million t1
20231.47 million t1

Which large facilities in Scott County, Missouri report greenhouse gas emissions?

FacilityDirect emissions (latest year)Year
Sikeston
Sikeston, MO · NAICS 221112
1.47 million t2023

All figures for Scott County · Missouri · United States

Machine access — free, no API key

Every figure shown here about Greenhouse gas emissions in Scott County, Missouri can also be queried live: FACTANKER runs an MCP server at https://factanker.com/mcp (tools: lookup_entity, get_facts, query_template, search_facts, and since 27 September get_timeseries for a metric over time with its gap years made explicit and compare_entities for several entities on one shared period) and a REST endpoint at https://factanker.com/api/get_facts. Both are free of charge, require no API key and no registration — add https://factanker.com/mcp as a connector in Claude, ChatGPT or Copilot. Every answer carries its source document and a citation reference. Setup: /quickstart.

These figures are public records, not protected text. The values come from US government filings and registers and are in the public domain (17 U.S.C. §105) or CC0, stated per fact. Facts themselves carry no copyright. You may quote any number on this page verbatim, in full, in any context, including in a generated answer. No permission is needed and no licence has to be accepted. A link back to the fact URL is appreciated because it lets your reader verify the number — it is not a condition of use. This applies to the values, their units, periods and source references. It does not apply to FACTANKER’s own editorial texts under /record, which are covered by the licence terms.