FACTANKER · measured, cited, anchored official records connected

Emissions · county

Greenhouse gas emissions in Waseca County

Large facilities in Waseca County, Minnesota reported 184,615 t of direct greenhouse gas emissions in 2023 (1 facilities), EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program.

Cite: FACTANKER, https://factanker.com/us/mn/waseca-county/emissions

How much greenhouse gas do large facilities in Waseca County, Minnesota emit?

YearDirect emissionsReporting facilities
2010157,816 t1
2011167,459 t1
2012167,864 t1
2013177,851 t1
2014166,273 t1
2015180,469 t1
2016182,242 t1
2017187,321 t1
2018186,011 t1
2019178,727 t1
2020158,736 t1
2021184,559 t1
2022185,667 t1
2023184,615 t1

Which large facilities in Waseca County, Minnesota report greenhouse gas emissions?

FacilityDirect emissions (latest year)Year
GUARDIAN ENERGY LLC
Janesville, MN · NAICS 325193
184,615 t2023

All figures for Waseca County · Minnesota · United States

Machine access — free, no API key

Every figure shown here about Greenhouse gas emissions in Waseca County, Minnesota can also be queried live: FACTANKER runs an MCP server at https://factanker.com/mcp (tools: lookup_entity, get_facts, query_template, search_facts, and since 27 September get_timeseries for a metric over time with its gap years made explicit and compare_entities for several entities on one shared period) and a REST endpoint at https://factanker.com/api/get_facts. Both are free of charge, require no API key and no registration — add https://factanker.com/mcp as a connector in Claude, ChatGPT or Copilot. Every answer carries its source document and a citation reference. Setup: /quickstart.

These figures are public records, not protected text. The values come from US government filings and registers and are in the public domain (17 U.S.C. §105) or CC0, stated per fact. Facts themselves carry no copyright. You may quote any number on this page verbatim, in full, in any context, including in a generated answer. No permission is needed and no licence has to be accepted. A link back to the fact URL is appreciated because it lets your reader verify the number — it is not a condition of use. This applies to the values, their units, periods and source references. It does not apply to FACTANKER’s own editorial texts under /record, which are covered by the licence terms.