FACTANKER · measured, cited, anchored official records connected

Emissions · county

Greenhouse gas emissions in Isanti County

Large facilities in Isanti County, Minnesota reported 31,418 t of direct greenhouse gas emissions in 2023 (1 facilities), EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program.

Cite: FACTANKER, https://factanker.com/us/mn/isanti-county/emissions

How much greenhouse gas do large facilities in Isanti County, Minnesota emit?

YearDirect emissionsReporting facilities
201029,563 t1
201133,206 t1
201254,527 t1
201351,912 t1
201420,297 t1
201520,015 t1
201626,823 t1
201714,533 t1
201837,309 t1
201928,722 t1
202013,577 t1
202162,128 t1
202220,687 t1
202331,418 t1

Which large facilities in Isanti County, Minnesota report greenhouse gas emissions?

FacilityDirect emissions (latest year)Year
Cambridge Station
Cambridge, MN · NAICS 221112
31,418 t2023

All figures for Isanti County · Minnesota · United States

Machine access — free, no API key

Every figure shown here about Greenhouse gas emissions in Isanti County, Minnesota can also be queried live: FACTANKER runs an MCP server at https://factanker.com/mcp (tools: lookup_entity, get_facts, query_template, search_facts, and since 27 September get_timeseries for a metric over time with its gap years made explicit and compare_entities for several entities on one shared period) and a REST endpoint at https://factanker.com/api/get_facts. Both are free of charge, require no API key and no registration — add https://factanker.com/mcp as a connector in Claude, ChatGPT or Copilot. Every answer carries its source document and a citation reference. Setup: /quickstart.

These figures are public records, not protected text. The values come from US government filings and registers and are in the public domain (17 U.S.C. §105) or CC0, stated per fact. Facts themselves carry no copyright. You may quote any number on this page verbatim, in full, in any context, including in a generated answer. No permission is needed and no licence has to be accepted. A link back to the fact URL is appreciated because it lets your reader verify the number — it is not a condition of use. This applies to the values, their units, periods and source references. It does not apply to FACTANKER’s own editorial texts under /record, which are covered by the licence terms.