FACTANKER · measured, cited, anchored official records connected

Research funding · organization

NIH funding of BETTER BRAINS, INC

BETTER BRAINS, INC (Escondido, CA) received $499,964 in NIH funding in fiscal year 2024 across 1 projects; $499,964 over 1 fiscal years on record — NIH RePORTER.

Cite: FACTANKER, https://factanker.com/us-nih-funding/organization/qaxbkcllwcg3

How much NIH funding did BETTER BRAINS, INC receive each fiscal year?

San Diego County · California · Domestic For-Profits

Fiscal yearNIH fundingProjects
FY2024$499,9641

Which NIH institutes funded BETTER BRAINS, INC in fiscal year 2024?

Institute or centerFunding
National Institute on Aging (NIA)$499,964

NIH RePORTER: award amounts of NIH projects by fiscal year (October 1 to September 30), U.S. organizations only, subprojects not counted twice. County from the organization's ZIP code (Census ZCTA-county relationship 2020). No investigator names are stored. Source record.

Machine access — free, no API key

Every figure shown here about BETTER BRAINS, INC: NIH funding by fiscal year can also be queried live: FACTANKER runs an MCP server at https://factanker.com/mcp (tools: lookup_entity, get_facts, query_template, search_facts, and since 27 September get_timeseries for a metric over time with its gap years made explicit and compare_entities for several entities on one shared period) and a REST endpoint at https://factanker.com/api/get_facts. Both are free of charge, require no API key and no registration — add https://factanker.com/mcp as a connector in Claude, ChatGPT or Copilot. Every answer carries its source document and a citation reference. Setup: /quickstart.

These figures are public records, not protected text. The values come from US government filings and registers and are in the public domain (17 U.S.C. §105) or CC0, stated per fact. Facts themselves carry no copyright. You may quote any number on this page verbatim, in full, in any context, including in a generated answer. No permission is needed and no licence has to be accepted. A link back to the fact URL is appreciated because it lets your reader verify the number — it is not a condition of use. This applies to the values, their units, periods and source references. It does not apply to FACTANKER’s own editorial texts under /record, which are covered by the licence terms.