FACTANKER · measured, cited, anchored official records connected

Research funding · organization

NIH funding of RETIVUE

RETIVUE (Charlottesville, VA) received $745,607 in NIH funding in fiscal year 2025 across 1 projects; $5.6 million over 8 fiscal years on record — NIH RePORTER.

Cite: FACTANKER, https://factanker.com/us-nih-funding/organization/hkj8uahr73m3

How much NIH funding did RETIVUE receive each fiscal year?

Albemarle County · Virginia · Domestic For-Profits

Fiscal yearNIH fundingProjects
FY2015$903,3761
FY2016$603,8921
FY2017$926,6931
FY2018$847,6971
FY2020$634,2311
FY2021$634,2311
FY2024$350,0001
FY2025$745,6071

Which NIH institutes funded RETIVUE in fiscal year 2025?

Institute or centerFunding
National Eye Institute (NEI)$745,607

NIH RePORTER: award amounts of NIH projects by fiscal year (October 1 to September 30), U.S. organizations only, subprojects not counted twice. County from the organization's ZIP code (Census ZCTA-county relationship 2020). No investigator names are stored. Source record.

Machine access — free, no API key

Every figure shown here about RETIVUE: NIH funding by fiscal year can also be queried live: FACTANKER runs an MCP server at https://factanker.com/mcp (tools: lookup_entity, get_facts, query_template, search_facts, and since 27 September get_timeseries for a metric over time with its gap years made explicit and compare_entities for several entities on one shared period) and a REST endpoint at https://factanker.com/api/get_facts. Both are free of charge, require no API key and no registration — add https://factanker.com/mcp as a connector in Claude, ChatGPT or Copilot. Every answer carries its source document and a citation reference. Setup: /quickstart.

These figures are public records, not protected text. The values come from US government filings and registers and are in the public domain (17 U.S.C. §105) or CC0, stated per fact. Facts themselves carry no copyright. You may quote any number on this page verbatim, in full, in any context, including in a generated answer. No permission is needed and no licence has to be accepted. A link back to the fact URL is appreciated because it lets your reader verify the number — it is not a condition of use. This applies to the values, their units, periods and source references. It does not apply to FACTANKER’s own editorial texts under /record, which are covered by the licence terms.