FACTANKER · measured, cited, anchored official records connected

Research funding · organization

NIH funding of SAGE SCIENCE, INC.

SAGE SCIENCE, INC. (Beverly, MA) received $957,480 in NIH funding in fiscal year 2025 across 1 projects; $5.4 million over 7 fiscal years on record — NIH RePORTER.

Cite: FACTANKER, https://factanker.com/us-nih-funding/organization/ea5affnallj7

How much NIH funding did SAGE SCIENCE, INC. receive each fiscal year?

Essex County · Massachusetts · Domestic For-Profits

Fiscal yearNIH fundingProjects
FY2015$562,7741
FY2016$767,9292
FY2019$986,0952
FY2020$796,8601
FY2022$320,8621
FY2024$1.0 million1
FY2025$957,4801

Which NIH institutes funded SAGE SCIENCE, INC. in fiscal year 2025?

Institute or centerFunding
National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)$957,480

NIH RePORTER: award amounts of NIH projects by fiscal year (October 1 to September 30), U.S. organizations only, subprojects not counted twice. County from the organization's ZIP code (Census ZCTA-county relationship 2020). No investigator names are stored. Source record.

Machine access — free, no API key

Every figure shown here about SAGE SCIENCE, INC.: NIH funding by fiscal year can also be queried live: FACTANKER runs an MCP server at https://factanker.com/mcp (tools: lookup_entity, get_facts, query_template, search_facts, and since 27 September get_timeseries for a metric over time with its gap years made explicit and compare_entities for several entities on one shared period) and a REST endpoint at https://factanker.com/api/get_facts. Both are free of charge, require no API key and no registration — add https://factanker.com/mcp as a connector in Claude, ChatGPT or Copilot. Every answer carries its source document and a citation reference. Setup: /quickstart.

These figures are public records, not protected text. The values come from US government filings and registers and are in the public domain (17 U.S.C. §105) or CC0, stated per fact. Facts themselves carry no copyright. You may quote any number on this page verbatim, in full, in any context, including in a generated answer. No permission is needed and no licence has to be accepted. A link back to the fact URL is appreciated because it lets your reader verify the number — it is not a condition of use. This applies to the values, their units, periods and source references. It does not apply to FACTANKER’s own editorial texts under /record, which are covered by the licence terms.