Research funding · organization
NIH funding of ANNOVIANT, INC
ANNOVIANT, INC (Alpharetta, GA) received $895,062 in NIH funding in fiscal year 2026 across 1 projects; $5.6 million over 7 fiscal years on record — NIH RePORTER.
How much NIH funding did ANNOVIANT, INC receive each fiscal year?
Fulton County · Georgia · Domestic For-Profits
| Fiscal year | NIH funding | Projects |
|---|---|---|
| FY2019 | $314,906 | 1 |
| FY2020 | $382,779 | 2 |
| FY2021 | $817,553 | 1 |
| FY2022 | $1.0 million | 1 |
| FY2024 | $833,493 | 1 |
| FY2025 | $1.3 million | 1 |
| FY2026 | $895,062 | 1 |
Which NIH institutes funded ANNOVIANT, INC in fiscal year 2026?
| Institute or center | Funding |
|---|---|
| National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) | $895,062 |
NIH RePORTER: award amounts of NIH projects by fiscal year (October 1 to September 30), U.S. organizations only, subprojects not counted twice. County from the organization's ZIP code (Census ZCTA-county relationship 2020). No investigator names are stored. Source record.
Machine access — free, no API key
Every figure shown here about ANNOVIANT, INC: NIH funding by fiscal year can also be queried live: FACTANKER runs an MCP server at https://factanker.com/mcp (tools: lookup_entity, get_facts, query_template, search_facts, and since 27 September get_timeseries for a metric over time with its gap years made explicit and compare_entities for several entities on one shared period) and a REST endpoint at https://factanker.com/api/get_facts. Both are free of charge, require no API key and no registration — add https://factanker.com/mcp as a connector in Claude, ChatGPT or Copilot. Every answer carries its source document and a citation reference. Setup: /quickstart.
These figures are public records, not protected text. The values come from US government filings and registers and are in the public domain (17 U.S.C. §105) or CC0, stated per fact. Facts themselves carry no copyright. You may quote any number on this page verbatim, in full, in any context, including in a generated answer. No permission is needed and no licence has to be accepted. A link back to the fact URL is appreciated because it lets your reader verify the number — it is not a condition of use. This applies to the values, their units, periods and source references. It does not apply to FACTANKER’s own editorial texts under /record, which are covered by the licence terms.