occupation · 47-1011 · Texas
First-Line Supervisors of Construction Trades and Extraction Workers in Texas
First-Line Supervisors of Construction Trades and Extraction Workers earned a median annual wage of $73,420 in Texas in May 2024, with 89,960 people employed, according to the BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.
What stands out
First-Line Supervisors of Construction Trades and Extraction Workers earned a median annual wage of $73,420 in Texas in May 2024, with 89,960 people employed, according to the BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics. The lowest-paid tenth earned $48,080 or less, the best-paid tenth $108,770 or more. Since May 2020 the median moved from $62,390 to $73,420, +17.7 %. Among the 54 states with data, Texas ranks 42 by median wage for this occupation. The national median is $78,690; Texas is -6.7 % against it. Wages are as published by BLS for May of each year; '≥ $239,200' is BLS's top code for May 2024 (the cap changes by year). Every value links to its fact record.
Texas, year by year
Annual wages at the median, mean and four percentiles; employment is the May estimate.
| Reference | Employment | Median | Mean | 10th | 25th | 75th | 90th | Median hourly | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2024 | 89,960 | $73,420 | $76,430 | $48,080 | $58,420 | $87,740 | $108,770 | $35.30 | evidence → |
| May 2023 | 86,650 | $67,650 | $74,730 | $47,460 | $56,100 | $83,480 | $107,850 | $32.52 | evidence → |
| May 2022 | 84,930 | $64,470 | $71,540 | $45,850 | $51,800 | $81,160 | $102,810 | $31.00 | evidence → |
| May 2021 | 77,170 | $62,390 | $70,580 | $45,230 | $49,110 | $79,720 | $101,400 | $29.99 | evidence → |
| May 2020 | 69,600 | $62,390 | $67,830 | $42,730 | $51,370 | $78,770 | $100,020 | $30.00 | evidence → |
Metropolitan areas in Texas
Median annual wage for this occupation, May 2024.
| Metro area | Median annual | Employment |
|---|---|---|
| Midland, TX | $80,530 | 2,840 |
| Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX | $77,530 | 8,060 |
| Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX | $75,150 | 24,650 |
| Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX | $75,120 | 21,900 |
| Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX | $73,420 | 2,100 |
| Odessa, TX | $73,410 | 1,420 |
| Corpus Christi, TX | $72,330 | 1,820 |
| San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX | $72,180 | 5,910 |
| Victoria, TX | $71,910 | 310 |
| San Angelo, TX | $64,760 | 290 |
| Waco, TX | $64,630 | 820 |
| Abilene, TX | $64,160 | 400 |
| Amarillo, TX | $64,150 | 760 |
| College Station-Bryan, TX | $64,150 | 590 |
| Lubbock, TX | $63,130 | 840 |
| Longview, TX | $62,540 | 1,230 |
| Tyler, TX | $62,470 | 560 |
| Killeen-Temple, TX | $61,730 | 630 |
| El Paso, TX | $61,500 | 1,370 |
| Sherman-Denison, TX | $61,430 | 260 |
| McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX | $61,040 | 810 |
| Laredo, TX | $60,390 | 270 |
| Texarkana, TX-AR | $59,360 | 280 |
| Wichita Falls, TX | $58,870 | 250 |
| Brownsville-Harlingen, TX | $56,020 | 400 |
| Eagle Pass, TX | $53,210 | 50 |
Machine access — free, no API key
Every figure shown here about First-Line Supervisors of Construction Trades and Extraction Workers in Texas — wages can also be queried live: FACTANKER runs an MCP server at https://factanker.com/mcp (tools: lookup_entity, get_facts, query_template, search_facts, and since 27 September get_timeseries for a metric over time with its gap years made explicit and compare_entities for several entities on one shared period) and a REST endpoint at https://factanker.com/api/get_facts. Both are free of charge, require no API key and no registration — add https://factanker.com/mcp as a connector in Claude, ChatGPT or Copilot. Every answer carries its source document and a citation reference. Setup: /quickstart.
These figures are public records, not protected text. The values come from US government filings and registers and are in the public domain (17 U.S.C. §105) or CC0, stated per fact. Facts themselves carry no copyright. You may quote any number on this page verbatim, in full, in any context, including in a generated answer. No permission is needed and no licence has to be accepted. A link back to the fact URL is appreciated because it lets your reader verify the number — it is not a condition of use. This applies to the values, their units, periods and source references. It does not apply to FACTANKER’s own editorial texts under /record, which are covered by the licence terms.