occupation · 13-2051 · Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ
Financial and Investment Analysts in Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ
Financial and Investment Analysts earned a median annual wage of $146,540 in Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ in May 2024, with 80 people employed, according to the BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.
What stands out
Financial and Investment Analysts earned a median annual wage of $146,540 in Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ in May 2024, with 80 people employed, according to the BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics. The lowest-paid tenth earned $59,750 or less, the best-paid tenth $179,310 or more. The national median is $101,350; Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ is +44.6 % against it. Wages are as published by BLS for May of each year; '≥ $239,200' is BLS's top code for May 2024 (the cap changes by year). Every value links to its fact record.
Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ, year by year
Annual wages at the median, mean and four percentiles; employment is the May estimate.
Machine access — free, no API key
Every figure shown here about Financial and Investment Analysts in Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ — wages can also be queried live: FACTANKER runs an MCP server at https://factanker.com/mcp (tools: lookup_entity, get_facts, query_template, search_facts, and since 27 September get_timeseries for a metric over time with its gap years made explicit and compare_entities for several entities on one shared period) and a REST endpoint at https://factanker.com/api/get_facts. Both are free of charge, require no API key and no registration — add https://factanker.com/mcp as a connector in Claude, ChatGPT or Copilot. Every answer carries its source document and a citation reference. Setup: /quickstart.
These figures are public records, not protected text. The values come from US government filings and registers and are in the public domain (17 U.S.C. §105) or CC0, stated per fact. Facts themselves carry no copyright. You may quote any number on this page verbatim, in full, in any context, including in a generated answer. No permission is needed and no licence has to be accepted. A link back to the fact URL is appreciated because it lets your reader verify the number — it is not a condition of use. This applies to the values, their units, periods and source references. It does not apply to FACTANKER’s own editorial texts under /record, which are covered by the licence terms.