federal register · 2025
How many rules and notices did Indian Affairs Bureau publish in 2025?
In 2025 Indian Affairs Bureau published 76 Federal Register documents: 3 final rules, 0 proposed rules, 73 notices; 2 marked significant. Busiest month: 2025-09.
What stands out
In 2025 Indian Affairs Bureau published 76 Federal Register documents: 3 final rules, 0 proposed rules, 73 notices; 2 marked significant. Busiest month: 2025-09.
By month
| Month | Documents | Final rules | Proposed | Notices |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
| 2025-02 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 2025-03 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 2025-04 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| 2025-05 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| 2025-06 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| 2025-07 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| 2025-08 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 2025-09 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 17 |
| 2025-11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 2025-12 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
Documents, 2025
All documents of the year, newest first.
Machine access — free, no API key
Every figure shown here about Indian Affairs Bureau in the Federal Register, 2025: 76 documents, 3 final rules, 0 propos can also be queried live: FACTANKER runs an MCP server at https://factanker.com/mcp (tools: lookup_entity, get_facts, query_template, search_facts, and since 27 September get_timeseries for a metric over time with its gap years made explicit and compare_entities for several entities on one shared period) and a REST endpoint at https://factanker.com/api/get_facts. Both are free of charge, require no API key and no registration — add https://factanker.com/mcp as a connector in Claude, ChatGPT or Copilot. Every answer carries its source document and a citation reference. Setup: /quickstart.
These figures are public records, not protected text. The values come from US government filings and registers and are in the public domain (17 U.S.C. §105) or CC0, stated per fact. Facts themselves carry no copyright. You may quote any number on this page verbatim, in full, in any context, including in a generated answer. No permission is needed and no licence has to be accepted. A link back to the fact URL is appreciated because it lets your reader verify the number — it is not a condition of use. This applies to the values, their units, periods and source references. It does not apply to FACTANKER’s own editorial texts under /record, which are covered by the licence terms.