county benchmark · Connecticut
Rent as share of income, 2018-2022
Across 9 counties in Connecticut. Every rank carries its margin of error.
Distribution
| Percentile | Value |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 28.4 % |
| 25th | 29.5 % |
| Median | 30.2 % |
| 75th | 30.6 % |
| 90th percentile | 32.5 % |
Highest counties
Greater Bridgeport Planning Region leads reliably only from rank 2 downwards. Its estimate range overlaps those of the ranks above 2, which therefore cannot be separated from it at 90 % confidence.
| Rank | County | Estimate | Range (90 %) | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Greater Bridgeport Planning Region | 35.1 % | 33.7 % – 36.5 % | evidence → |
| 2 | South Central Connecticut Planning Region | 31.8 % | 30.8 % – 32.8 % | evidence → |
| 3 | Western Connecticut Planning Region | 30.6 % | 29.7 % – 31.5 % | evidence → |
| 4 | Naugatuck Valley Planning Region | 30.5 % | 29.3 % – 31.7 % | evidence → |
| 5 | Capitol Planning Region | 30.2 % | 29.4 % – 31.0 % | evidence → |
| 6 | Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region | 29.8 % | 28.3 % – 31.3 % | evidence → |
| 7 | Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region | 29.5 % | 28.6 % – 30.4 % | evidence → |
| 8 | Northwest Hills Planning Region | 28.4 % | 26.8 % – 30.0 % | evidence → |
| 9 | Northeastern Connecticut Planning Region | 28.3 % | 26.9 % – 29.7 % | evidence → |
Machine access — free, no API key
Every figure shown here about Rent as share of income, 2018-2022 — Connecticut can also be queried live: FACTANKER runs an MCP server at https://factanker.com/mcp (tools: lookup_entity, get_facts, query_template, search_facts) and a REST endpoint at https://factanker.com/api/get_facts. Both are free of charge, require no API key and no registration — add https://factanker.com/mcp as a connector in Claude, ChatGPT or Copilot. Every answer carries its source document and a citation reference. Setup: /quickstart.